Full Table of Contents
_______________

Abbreviated
Table of Contents

Home Page
Patient Safety
Silence vs
    Safety
Silenced
White wall
    of Silence
Silencing
Conflict Of
    Interest
Psychology of
    Providers
Subjectivity
Blacklisting  
Nurse survey
Loyalty
Mobbing and
    bullying
Trust Us
Defensive
    documenting
Report Rate
Risk
    managemnt
SOAP
Management
Hospitals
Crime in
    medicine
Sexual Abuse
Liability
    Limitations
Free Speech
    for Patients
Exploitation

OSMB Medical
    Boards
Mammography
solutions
Medical errors
Medical Complaints
One number
Links

 

Injured patients who want to help and be heard, click here.

 

Thomas Jefferson said that given the choice between government without newspapers and newspapers without government, he would choose newspapers.

In medicine we have government without newspapers. Patients cannot find out what they need to know to make informed choices. No one in medicine records or reports the information patients need to know the most. So patients will have to do it.

Mammography

Why the government cannot fix health care

Many radiologists, and other analyzers of x-rays, lack the ability to discern the shadows and swirls in a mammogram that indicate cancer. But no one knows who can do it and who cannot. No one checks. No one is counting. Even the doctors themselves do not know how they are doing. Patients are shooting dice when getting mammograms hoping to luck into doctors capable of doing the job. In a country where batting averages and pitching speeds are known to the fourth decimal place, there is no data on which doctors accurately detect cancer and which can't.

If baseball were run that way, your physician could be pinch hitting for Ken Griffey, Jr.

Studies in North Carolina and New Hampshire found that some clinics miss 40% of tumors. In New York a radiologist in the Bronx was found to have missed 25 tumors while finding only 7 in two years. No one knows how the rest of the clinics in America are doing. No one keeps track.

The federal government was alarmed and wanted to weed out doctors whose track records at discovering cancer were worse than bad luck. Doctors and their allies derailed it. Instead, to appease the government, they allowed the government to monitor the mammography equipment used by inept radiologists. Health care professionals want it to be assumed that all operators are equal and good. Inept doctors reviewing x-rays earn livings for decades without anyone looking to see which doctors can detect cancer and which can't. (A long article about it is in The New York Times, June 27, 2002). It is not in the interest of people in medicine to collect accurate data on competency. So they don't. And they don't allow others to do it either.

It is the most important thing for patients to know. Otherwise they are rolling dice hoping to happen upon a good radiologist. And then after that, rolling dice hoping to get the right treatment. Should they get MammoSite, for instance? It is one of the treatments available for breast cancer. Is it the best option? Click the link.

 

_____________________________________________________________

Home | Table of Contents | It's a Path
Silence versus Patient Safety
Loyalty versus Patient Safety
The White Wall of Silence versus Patient Safety
Blacklisting Patients
Freedom of Speech for Patients
Medical Complaints - How to

 < Truth / Justice / Patient Safety >
It's a path

If you want to say something about any of my sites, my phone number is on almost every page. So is my email address. There even are Feedback Forms where you can communicate anonymously. I am listening. I will be sensitive to what you say.

To contact me, click email
or call 513-348-4744 in the USA
Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved
Revised August 29, 2010