Full Table of Contents
_______________

Abbreviated
Table of Contents

Home Page
Patient Safety
Silence vs
    Safety
Silenced
White wall
    of Silence
Silencing
Conflict Of
    Interest
Psychology of
    Providers
Subjectivity
Blacklisting  
Nurse survey
Loyalty
Mobbing and
    bullying
Trust Us
Defensive
    documenting
Report Rate
Risk
    managemnt
SOAP
Management
Hospitals
Crime in
    medicine
Sexual Abuse
Liability
    Limitations
Free Speech
    for Patients
Exploitation

OSMB Medical
    Boards
Mammography
solutions
Medical errors
Medical Complaints
One number
Links

 

Injured patients who want to help and be heard, click here.

 

Thomas Jefferson said that given the choice between government without newspapers and newspapers without government, he would choose newspapers.

In medicine we have government without newspapers. Patients cannot find out what they need to know to make informed choices. No one in medicine records or reports the information patients need to know the most. So patients will have to do it.

Defensive Documentation

Is there a skill more basic to medicine than getting the patient's history?

In medicine a great deal of attention is paid to the chart - from medical school onward. The clipboard containing the chart is one of the iconographic images of medicine. When a doctor comes in to see the patient he wears a stethoscope and carries a clipboard containing the patient's history on a chart. This is medicine at its most basic. This is where it all starts, or in some cases, ends.

Routine practice with regard to charts is defensive documentation and risk-reduction techniques. It is tailored to make medicine safe for healthcare providers. Defensive documentation is taught in medical schools. It is required by insurance companies and government agencies. Medical associations publish primers and refreshers to keep their members well schooled and up to date.

The core of this documentation, the chart, is the patient's history and the doctor's thoughts about what to do. It is important not only because it is ground zero for a patient's wellbeing, but also because it is a legal document. In our litigious and regulated world, charts are created with an awareness of how others might interpret them in the future.

Defensive Documentation

Defensive documentation includes not only gathering the patient's subjective observations, but also documenting the objective diagnosis, the advice given to the patient, and the thought processes behind that and the follow-up plan. The well-known acronym for that is SOAP.

When a patient goes to a caregiver with injuries, is asked how he/she got injured and says that it was caused by someone else in medicine, the patient thinks the physician writes that down. A normal patient expects to get help for the injuries. A normal patient does not expect to be blacklisted for reporting that. A normal patient does not even know that is possible. Blacklisting is worse than the white wall of silence.

Currently doctors are not disciplined for failing to report unfriendly practices (see Dr. James Burt). They are not disciplined for refusing to help patients who have been injured by unfriendly practices (see Burt again). They are not even disciplined for taking advantage of a patient's trust in order to prevent him/her from getting help (see blacklisting patients).

Open Notes

Fortunately Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston is getting ready (June 2009) to experiment with putting the physician's notes on line where patients can read their own notes. Patients will be able to see what actually got recorded. Patients already have a legal right to obtain their paper records, which is supposed to include notes (which easily can be lost for simply not provided when they don't want the patient to know something), but patients often have to wait months to get copies, often must pay a fee, and sometimes even have to go so far as to get a subpoena when the physician doesn't want the patient to see them. Online access would be easy and immediate.

Would physicians start keeping two sets of notes? Like an accountant who keeps one set for the IRS and the stock holders and another set for the criminals running the company? Of course. Perhaps most physicians won't, but the dangerous ones will of course.

Dr. Lawrence Garber, medical director for informatics at Fallon Clinic in Worcester. Fallon Clinic, said “I might write ‘Don’t forget to ask them about their visit to Spain.’ A certain magic happens at the next visit,’’ Garber said. “The patient thinks, ‘How great, this doctor cares about me enough to ask about my trip.’ ’’ Pulling back the curtain, he said, might destroy that magic.

That's part of why patients need to see the notes - to reduce the extent to which medicine is no more well understood than magic. Patients need to understand the reality so that they can be informed and intelligent consumers, not an awed audience at a magic show.

Dr. Lisa Gilbert, an internist in a Beth Israel Deaconess practice in Lexington said that she has a lot of concerns about sharing notes with patients online like that. Her biggest worry is that patients will have so many questions that she will get daily communications interrupting her from patients trying to understand the notes, like what does "SOB" mean in the notes? (Shortness Of Breath). And what does neoplasm mean? (Cancer).

Our response is to suggest including a standard link a list of abbreviations, perhaps to one already existing on line. Make the link a standard header for all the notes. Perhaps write, or have someone write, some macros so that the twenty most common abbreviations are inserted with two keystrokes that insert the abbreviation as a clickable link to its definition, a definition that has clickable links to more information.

Beth Israel already makes lab and radiology results available to patients in their online medical record. Dr. Gilbert say she believes that patient access to that has improved care without increasing her workload. “Sometimes patients catch things that slip through the cracks,’’ she said. “People are just becoming much more savvy about healthcare and they want access to this information.’’

Dr. David Ives, who also practices in Lexington, said, “I might say in my notes that a patient’s weight is up another 20 pounds and that I counseled them on the increased chance of diabetes with age and weight gain. They might not hear that in the office. But if they read it, they might.’’

Smaller experiments allowing patients access to their doctors’ notes generally have been successful.

If all patients records were available online, when an injured patient went to a physician and explained that the injuries for which treatment is sought were caused by someone else in medicine, the patient would be able to see that no note was made of that. When that happened time after time, it might take less long for the patient to figure out what was going on.

If you are reading this in 2010 (I hope not even later), send me a note reminding me to update the information on how the Open Notes project is going at Beth Israel.

_____________________________________________________________

Home | Table of Contents | It's a Path
Silence versus Patient Safety
Loyalty versus Patient Safety
The White Wall of Silence versus Patient Safety
Blacklisting Patients
Freedom of Speech for Patients
Medical Complaints - How to

 < Truth / Justice / Patient Safety >
It's a path

If you want to say something about any of my sites, my phone number is on almost every page. So is my email address. There even are Feedback Forms where you can communicate anonymously. I am listening. I will be sensitive to what you say.

To contact me, click email
or call 513-348-4744 in the USA
Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved
Revised March 11, 2010